Data last collected:
Felt · Teton · ID
Felt
Operated by Fall River Rural Elec Coop Inc
Published location
Where is Felt?
This locator uses the coordinates in the approved source record. It shows geographic context, not a site boundary, safety zone or property-risk area.
43.913476, -111.283319
Open the interactive map ↗Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors
Equipment mix
Operating capacity by technology
Grouped from this plant’s represented generator records. Use the ID plant index for regional peers.
See the evidence
Electricity output across the year
Monthly net generation shows the seasonal shape of this plant's represented output. A negative value is retained when the source reports net consumption.
MWh net generation · 2024 final edition · EIA 923 represented operating rows. 12 of 12 supplied rows shown; 0 missing values omitted. Months with no reported numeric value are omitted, not treated as zero.
Read the chart as a table
| Record | MWh net generation |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1,767 |
| 2 | 1,721 |
| 3 | 1,757 |
| 4 | 3,138 |
| 5 | 3,573 |
| 6 | 3,471 |
| 7 | 3,182 |
| 8 | 1,570 |
| 9 | 2,042 |
| 10 | 1,909 |
| 11 | 1,852 |
| 12 | 1,771 |
2024 monthly net generation
| Month | Net generation |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1,767 MWh |
| 2 | 1,721 MWh |
| 3 | 1,757 MWh |
| 4 | 3,138 MWh |
| 5 | 3,573 MWh |
| 6 | 3,471 MWh |
| 7 | 3,182 MWh |
| 8 | 1,570 MWh |
| 9 | 2,042 MWh |
| 10 | 1,909 MWh |
| 11 | 1,852 MWh |
| 12 | 1,771 MWh |
Operating generators
| ID | Technology | Fuel | MW | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Conventional Hydroelectric | WAT | 2.7 | OP |
| 2 | Conventional Hydroelectric | WAT | 2.7 | OP |
| 5 | Conventional Hydroelectric | WAT | 1.1 | OP |
| 4 | Conventional Hydroelectric | WAT | 0.9 | OP |
Continue exploring
Similar-capacity plants in the same state
Identity, technology and limitations
Use this record
Questions this evidence can answer
Use the name, place, date and identifiers above to confirm that you have the right Felt power plant: capacity and generation | PowerPlantFacts record.
Read the reported values with their units, coverage dates and source notes. Keep observed facts separate from estimates or interpretation.
Follow the primary-source links and check the limitations before using this evidence for a decision, comparison or citation.
A closer look at Felt
Variation in the published months
Across 12 numeric monthly generation entries, 5 has the highest recorded value (3,573 MWh) and 8 the lowest (1,570 MWh). Their difference is 2,003 MWh. Missing months have not been treated as zero.
Reading the MW column
In the 4 numeric rows displayed in this table, MW ranges from 0.9 (4) to 2.7 (1, 2). The difference is 1.8 in the column's stated units. This summary covers the displayed rows and retains the table's period and scope.
Generator capacity in different operating conditions
| Generator ID | Technology | Nameplate MW | Summer MW | Winter MW | Minimum load MW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Conventional Hydroelectric | 2.7 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 1.0 |
| 2 | Conventional Hydroelectric | 2.7 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 1.0 |
| 4 | Conventional Hydroelectric | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
| 5 | Conventional Hydroelectric | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
EIA-860 2024 final source. Ratings describe capacity, not actual generation or availability. Missing ratings are not zero.
Source: US Energy Information Administration Form EIA-860 2024 plant and operable-generator workbooks; archive 2024. US EIA-authored information is generally public domain; cite EIA, preserve third-party exceptions, changes and no-endorsement context. Source-specific derived data.