MWPowerPlantFacts

Data last collected:

EIA plant 3075

Cascade Locks · Multnomah · OR

Bonneville

Operated by USACE Northwestern Division

Annual generation3,492,864 MWhSum of represented EIA-923 rows
Fuel codesWATCodes retained from EIA records
Grid contextBonneville Power AdministrationBalancing authority or NERC region

Published location

Where is Bonneville?

This locator uses the coordinates in the approved source record. It shows geographic context, not a site boundary, safety zone or property-risk area.

45.644100, -121.941009

Open the interactive map ↗
Capacity is not generation. Nameplate MW describes equipment; annual MWh describes recorded output. Proposed and retired units are not added to operating capacity.

Equipment mix

Operating capacity by technology

TechnologyConventional Hydroelectric1,162 MW represented

Grouped from this plant’s represented generator records. Use the OR plant index for regional peers.

See the evidence

Electricity output across the year

Monthly net generation shows the seasonal shape of this plant's represented output. A negative value is retained when the source reports net consumption.

1404,682
2397,072
3420,604
4206,925
5149,956
6192,722
7157,625
8212,296
9268,948
10268,319
11377,582
12436,133

MWh net generation · 2024 final edition · EIA 923 represented operating rows. 12 of 12 supplied rows shown; 0 missing values omitted. Months with no reported numeric value are omitted, not treated as zero.

Read the chart as a table
Electricity output across the year — MWh net generation
RecordMWh net generation
1404,682
2397,072
3420,604
4206,925
5149,956
6192,722
7157,625
8212,296
9268,948
10268,319
11377,582
12436,133

2024 monthly net generation

MonthNet generation
1404,682 MWh
2397,072 MWh
3420,604 MWh
4206,925 MWh
5149,956 MWh
6192,722 MWh
7157,625 MWh
8212,296 MWh
9268,948 MWh
10268,319 MWh
11377,582 MWh
12436,133 MWh

Operating generators

IDTechnologyFuelMWStatus
11Conventional HydroelectricWAT66.5OP
12Conventional HydroelectricWAT66.5OP
13Conventional HydroelectricWAT66.5OP
14Conventional HydroelectricWAT66.5OP
15Conventional HydroelectricWAT66.5OP
16Conventional HydroelectricWAT66.5OP
17Conventional HydroelectricWAT66.5OP
18Conventional HydroelectricWAT66.5OA
10Conventional HydroelectricWAT62.1OA
3Conventional HydroelectricWAT62.1OP
4Conventional HydroelectricWAT62.1OP
5Conventional HydroelectricWAT62.1OA
6Conventional HydroelectricWAT62.1OA
7Conventional HydroelectricWAT62.1OA
8Conventional HydroelectricWAT62.1OA
9Conventional HydroelectricWAT62.1OA
1Conventional HydroelectricWAT53.5OP
2Conventional HydroelectricWAT53.5OA
F1Conventional HydroelectricWAT13.1OP
F2Conventional HydroelectricWAT13.1OA

Continue exploring

Similar-capacity plants in the same state

Identity, technology and limitations
EIA plant ID
3075
Sector
Electric Utility
Water source
Columbia River
Data edition
2024-final

Use this record

Questions this evidence can answer

01What exactly is this record?

Use the name, place, date and identifiers above to confirm that you have the right Bonneville power plant: capacity and generation | PowerPlantFacts record.

02What does the evidence establish?

Read the reported values with their units, coverage dates and source notes. Keep observed facts separate from estimates or interpretation.

03What should I verify next?

Follow the primary-source links and check the limitations before using this evidence for a decision, comparison or citation.

A closer look at Bonneville

Variation in the published months

Across 12 numeric monthly generation entries, 12 has the highest recorded value (436,133 MWh) and 5 the lowest (149,956 MWh). Their difference is 286,177 MWh. Missing months have not been treated as zero.

Reading the MW column

In the 20 numeric rows displayed in this table, MW ranges from 13.1 (F1, F2) to 66.5 (11, 12, 13). The difference is 53.4 in the column's stated units. This summary covers the displayed rows and retains the table's period and scope.

Generator capacity in different operating conditions

Generator IDTechnologyNameplate MWSummer MWWinter MWMinimum load MW
1Conventional Hydroelectric53.553.553.513.2
10Conventional Hydroelectric62.154.054.013.2
11Conventional Hydroelectric66.566.566.523.2
12Conventional Hydroelectric66.566.566.523.2
13Conventional Hydroelectric66.566.566.523.2
14Conventional Hydroelectric66.566.566.523.2
15Conventional Hydroelectric66.566.566.523.2
16Conventional Hydroelectric66.566.566.523.2
17Conventional Hydroelectric66.566.566.523.2
18Conventional Hydroelectric66.566.566.523.2
2Conventional Hydroelectric53.553.553.513.2
3Conventional Hydroelectric62.162.162.113.2
4Conventional Hydroelectric62.162.162.113.2
5Conventional Hydroelectric62.162.162.113.2
6Conventional Hydroelectric62.162.162.113.2
7Conventional Hydroelectric62.162.162.113.2
8Conventional Hydroelectric62.162.162.113.2
9Conventional Hydroelectric62.162.162.113.2
F1Conventional Hydroelectric13.113.113.113.1
F2Conventional Hydroelectric13.113.113.113.1

EIA-860 2024 final source. Ratings describe capacity, not actual generation or availability. Missing ratings are not zero.

Source: US Energy Information Administration Form EIA-860 2024 plant and operable-generator workbooks; archive 2024. US EIA-authored information is generally public domain; cite EIA, preserve third-party exceptions, changes and no-endorsement context. Source-specific derived data.

Power plant research

Before you decide, check these points against the current source.

Things to check