MWPowerPlantFacts

Data last collected:

EIA plant 58084

New Milford · Litchfield · CT

Kimberly Clark-Unit 1,2,3

Operated by Kimberly-Clark Corporation

Annual generation218,986 MWhSum of represented EIA-923 rows
Fuel codesNGCodes retained from EIA records
Grid contextISO New England Inc.Balancing authority or NERC region

Published location

Where is Kimberly Clark-Unit 1,2,3?

This locator uses the coordinates in the approved source record. It shows geographic context, not a site boundary, safety zone or property-risk area.

41.558333, -73.413611

Open the interactive map ↗
Capacity is not generation. Nameplate MW describes equipment; annual MWh describes recorded output. Proposed and retired units are not added to operating capacity.

Equipment mix

Operating capacity by technology

TechnologyNatural Gas Fired Combined Cycle20.2 MW represented
TechnologyNatural Gas Fired Combustion Turbine16.1 MW represented

Grouped from this plant’s represented generator records. Use the CT plant index for regional peers.

See the evidence

Electricity output across the year

Monthly net generation shows the seasonal shape of this plant's represented output. A negative value is retained when the source reports net consumption.

119,548.12
217,728.21
319,653.48
413,884.79
518,237.5
619,450.89
719,654.24
819,118.99
917,342.25
1013,963.43
1120,161.39
1220,242.72

MWh net generation · 2024 final edition · EIA 923 represented operating rows. 12 of 12 supplied rows shown; 0 missing values omitted. Months with no reported numeric value are omitted, not treated as zero.

Read the chart as a table
Electricity output across the year — MWh net generation
RecordMWh net generation
119,548.12
217,728.21
319,653.48
413,884.79
518,237.5
619,450.89
719,654.24
819,118.99
917,342.25
1013,963.43
1120,161.39
1220,242.72

2024 monthly net generation

MonthNet generation
119,548 MWh
217,728 MWh
319,653 MWh
413,885 MWh
518,237 MWh
619,451 MWh
719,654 MWh
819,119 MWh
917,342 MWh
1013,963 MWh
1120,161 MWh
1220,243 MWh

Operating generators

IDTechnologyFuelMWStatus
GT100Natural Gas Fired Combined CycleNG16.1OP
GT200Natural Gas Fired Combustion TurbineNG16.1OP
GT300Natural Gas Fired Combined CycleNG4.1OP

Continue exploring

Similar-capacity plants in the same state

Identity, technology and limitations
EIA plant ID
58084
Sector
Industrial CHP
Water source
Houstanic River
Data edition
2024-final

Use this record

Questions this evidence can answer

01What exactly is this record?

Use the name, place, date and identifiers above to confirm that you have the right Kimberly Clark-Unit 1,2,3 power plant: capacity and generation | PowerPlantFacts record.

02What does the evidence establish?

Read the reported values with their units, coverage dates and source notes. Keep observed facts separate from estimates or interpretation.

03What should I verify next?

Follow the primary-source links and check the limitations before using this evidence for a decision, comparison or citation.

A closer look at Kimberly Clark-Unit 1,2,3

Variation in the published months

Across 12 numeric monthly generation entries, 12 has the highest recorded value (20,243 MWh) and 4 the lowest (13,885 MWh). Their difference is 6,358 MWh. Missing months have not been treated as zero.

Reading the MW column

In the 3 numeric rows displayed in this table, MW ranges from 4.1 (GT300) to 16.1 (GT100, GT200). The difference is 12 in the column's stated units. This summary covers the displayed rows and retains the table's period and scope.

Generator capacity in different operating conditions

Generator IDTechnologyNameplate MWSummer MWWinter MWMinimum load MW
GT100Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle16.114.516.17.0
GT200Natural Gas Fired Combustion Turbine16.114.516.17.0
GT300Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle4.14.14.10.4

EIA-860 2024 final source. Ratings describe capacity, not actual generation or availability. Missing ratings are not zero.

Source: US Energy Information Administration Form EIA-860 2024 plant and operable-generator workbooks; archive 2024. US EIA-authored information is generally public domain; cite EIA, preserve third-party exceptions, changes and no-endorsement context. Source-specific derived data.

Power plant research

Before you decide, check these points against the current source.

Things to check