Data last collected:
Columbia · Houston · AL
Joseph M Farley
Operated by Alabama Power Co
Published location
Where is Joseph M Farley?
This locator uses the coordinates in the approved source record. It shows geographic context, not a site boundary, safety zone or property-risk area.
31.223100, -85.111600
Open the interactive map ↗Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors
Equipment mix
Operating capacity by technology
Grouped from this plant’s represented generator records. Use the AL plant index for regional peers.
See the evidence
Electricity output across the year
Monthly net generation shows the seasonal shape of this plant's represented output. A negative value is retained when the source reports net consumption.
MWh net generation · 2024 final edition · EIA 923 represented operating rows. 12 of 12 supplied rows shown; 0 missing values omitted. Months with no reported numeric value are omitted, not treated as zero.
Read the chart as a table
| Record | MWh net generation |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1,367,565 |
| 2 | 1,210,979 |
| 3 | 1,360,112 |
| 4 | 780,861 |
| 5 | 1,077,914 |
| 6 | 1,294,159 |
| 7 | 1,335,616 |
| 8 | 1,326,392 |
| 9 | 1,299,818 |
| 10 | 1,355,469 |
| 11 | 1,311,285 |
| 12 | 1,363,805 |
2024 monthly net generation
| Month | Net generation |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1,367,565 MWh |
| 2 | 1,210,979 MWh |
| 3 | 1,360,112 MWh |
| 4 | 780,861 MWh |
| 5 | 1,077,914 MWh |
| 6 | 1,294,159 MWh |
| 7 | 1,335,616 MWh |
| 8 | 1,326,392 MWh |
| 9 | 1,299,818 MWh |
| 10 | 1,355,469 MWh |
| 11 | 1,311,285 MWh |
| 12 | 1,363,805 MWh |
Operating generators
| ID | Technology | Fuel | MW | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nuclear | NUC | 888.2 | OP |
| 2 | Nuclear | NUC | 888.2 | OP |
Continue exploring
Similar-capacity plants in the same state
Identity, technology and limitations
Use this record
Questions this evidence can answer
Use the name, place, date and identifiers above to confirm that you have the right Joseph M Farley power plant: capacity and generation | PowerPlantFacts record.
Read the reported values with their units, coverage dates and source notes. Keep observed facts separate from estimates or interpretation.
Follow the primary-source links and check the limitations before using this evidence for a decision, comparison or citation.
A closer look at Joseph M Farley
Variation in the published months
Across 12 numeric monthly generation entries, 1 has the highest recorded value (1,367,565 MWh) and 4 the lowest (780,861 MWh). Their difference is 586,704 MWh. Missing months have not been treated as zero.
Generator capacity in different operating conditions
| Generator ID | Technology | Nameplate MW | Summer MW | Winter MW | Minimum load MW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nuclear | 888.2 | 895.0 | 895.0 | 250.0 |
| 2 | Nuclear | 888.2 | 896.0 | 896.0 | 250.0 |
EIA-860 2024 final source. Ratings describe capacity, not actual generation or availability. Missing ratings are not zero.
Source: US Energy Information Administration Form EIA-860 2024 plant and operable-generator workbooks; archive 2024. US EIA-authored information is generally public domain; cite EIA, preserve third-party exceptions, changes and no-endorsement context. Source-specific derived data.