Data last collected:
PowerPlantFactsEvidence report · prepared 19 October 2026https://powerplantfacts.com/entity/7805
EIA plant 7805
Hamlet · Richmond · NC
Sherwood H Smith Jr Energy Complex
Operated by Duke Energy Progress - (NC)
Published location
Where is Sherwood H Smith Jr Energy Complex?
This locator uses the coordinates in the approved source record. It shows geographic context, not a site boundary, safety zone or property-risk area.
34.839200, -79.740600
Open the interactive map ↗Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors
Capacity is not generation. Nameplate MW describes equipment; annual MWh describes recorded output. Proposed and retired units are not added to operating capacity.
Equipment mix
Operating capacity by technology
Grouped from this plant’s represented generator records. Use the NC plant index for regional peers.
See the evidence
Electricity output across the year
Monthly net generation shows the seasonal shape of this plant's represented output. A negative value is retained when the source reports net consumption.
1857,194
2501,718
3302,121
4785,581.01
5721,634
6853,875.01
71,048,451
8990,271.01
9785,970
10845,730
11883,506
12848,278
MWh net generation · 2024 final edition · EIA 923 represented operating rows. 12 of 12 supplied rows shown; 0 missing values omitted. Months with no reported numeric value are omitted, not treated as zero.
Read the chart as a table
| Record | MWh net generation |
|---|---|
| 1 | 857,194 |
| 2 | 501,718 |
| 3 | 302,121 |
| 4 | 785,581.01 |
| 5 | 721,634 |
| 6 | 853,875.01 |
| 7 | 1,048,451 |
| 8 | 990,271.01 |
| 9 | 785,970 |
| 10 | 845,730 |
| 11 | 883,506 |
| 12 | 848,278 |
2024 monthly net generation
| Month | Net generation |
|---|---|
| 1 | 857,194 MWh |
| 2 | 501,718 MWh |
| 3 | 302,121 MWh |
| 4 | 785,581 MWh |
| 5 | 721,634 MWh |
| 6 | 853,875 MWh |
| 7 | 1,048,451 MWh |
| 8 | 990,271 MWh |
| 9 | 785,970 MWh |
| 10 | 845,730 MWh |
| 11 | 883,506 MWh |
| 12 | 848,278 MWh |
Operating generators
| ID | Technology | Fuel | MW | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST5 | Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle | NG | 271.1 | OP |
| 001 | Natural Gas Fired Combustion Turbine | NG | 199.4 | OP |
| 002 | Natural Gas Fired Combustion Turbine | NG | 199.4 | OP |
| 003 | Natural Gas Fired Combustion Turbine | NG | 199.4 | OP |
| 004 | Natural Gas Fired Combustion Turbine | NG | 199.4 | OP |
| 6 | Natural Gas Fired Combustion Turbine | NG | 199.4 | OP |
| 7 | Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle | NG | 199.4 | OP |
| 8 | Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle | NG | 199.4 | OP |
| ST4 | Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle | NG | 195.5 | OP |
| 10 | Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle | NG | 191.2 | OP |
| 9 | Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle | NG | 191.2 | OP |
Continue exploring
Similar-capacity plants in the same state
Identity, technology and limitations
EIA plant ID
7805
Sector
Electric Utility
Water source
Pee Dee River
Data edition
2024-final
Use this record
Questions this evidence can answer
01What exactly is this record?
Use the name, place, date and identifiers above to confirm that you have the right Sherwood H Smith Jr Energy Complex power plant: capacity and generation | PowerPlantFacts record.
02What does the evidence establish?
Read the reported values with their units, coverage dates and source notes. Keep observed facts separate from estimates or interpretation.
03What should I verify next?
Follow the primary-source links and check the limitations before using this evidence for a decision, comparison or citation.
A closer look at Sherwood H Smith Jr Energy Complex
Variation in the published months
Across 12 numeric monthly generation entries, 7 has the highest recorded value (1,048,451 MWh) and 3 the lowest (302,121 MWh). Their difference is 746,330 MWh. Missing months have not been treated as zero.
Reading the MW column
In the 11 numeric rows displayed in this table, MW ranges from 191.2 (10, 9) to 271.1 (ST5). The difference is 79.9 in the column's stated units. This summary covers the displayed rows and retains the table's period and scope.
Generator capacity in different operating conditions
| Generator ID | Technology | Nameplate MW | Summer MW | Winter MW | Minimum load MW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Natural Gas Fired Combustion Turbine | 199.4 | 165.0 | 200.0 | 100.0 |
| 002 | Natural Gas Fired Combustion Turbine | 199.4 | 164.0 | 200.0 | 100.0 |
| 003 | Natural Gas Fired Combustion Turbine | 199.4 | 160.0 | 200.0 | 100.0 |
| 004 | Natural Gas Fired Combustion Turbine | 199.4 | 159.0 | 200.0 | 100.0 |
| 10 | Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle | 191.2 | 178.0 | 215.0 | 178.0 |
| 6 | Natural Gas Fired Combustion Turbine | 199.4 | 152.0 | 200.0 | 100.0 |
| 7 | Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle | 199.4 | 152.0 | 193.0 | 152.0 |
| 8 | Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle | 199.4 | 152.0 | 193.0 | 152.0 |
| 9 | Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle | 191.2 | 178.0 | 215.0 | 178.0 |
| ST4 | Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle | 195.5 | 171.0 | 184.0 | 171.0 |
| ST5 | Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle | 271.1 | 252.0 | 250.0 | 252.0 |
EIA-860 2024 final source. Ratings describe capacity, not actual generation or availability. Missing ratings are not zero.
Source: US Energy Information Administration Form EIA-860 2024 plant and operable-generator workbooks; archive 2024. US EIA-authored information is generally public domain; cite EIA, preserve third-party exceptions, changes and no-endorsement context. Source-specific derived data.